Obstetric Expert Witness
Obstetric Medical-Legal Insights for Attorneys
In-depth educational articles on obstetric malpractice topics — fetal monitoring, birth injury, hemorrhage, and more — from an obstetric expert witness perspective.
In-depth educational articles on obstetric malpractice topics — fetal monitoring, birth injury, hemorrhage, and more — from an obstetric expert witness perspective.
This section of OBGYN Peer's Medical-Legal Insights addresses the clinical and legal dimensions of obstetric malpractice litigation. Each article focuses on a specific topic — standard of care, common departures, causation principles, and the questions that matter in court. Articles are written by Dr. Yusria Malik, MD, MPH, FACOG, a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist who serves as an obstetric expert witness for plaintiff and defense counsel nationwide.
For case-specific consultation and birth injury expert witness services, contact OBGYN Peer directly.
A Category II tracing is not a diagnosis of fetal acidemia, and it is not automatically evidence of negligent care. The central question is whether the evolving pattern was recognized, interpreted in context, managed reasonably, and reassessed over time.
Read Article →
When a newborn has seizures, abnormal tone, low Apgar scores, or brain injury on MRI, the outcome is serious — but the cause is not established by the diagnosis alone. Neonatal encephalopathy is a clinical syndrome with multiple potential etiologies.
Read Article →
Shoulder dystocia is an obstetric emergency defined by the need for additional maneuvers after delivery of the fetal head. It is often unpredictable, and the presence of risk factors does not mean the event was preventable.
Read Article →
Postpartum hemorrhage cases are rarely understood by looking only at the final estimated blood loss. The more useful questions are when bleeding became abnormal, whether the cause was recognized, and whether treatment escalated with the clinical trajectory.
Read Article →
Severe-range blood pressure in pregnancy or postpartum is a time-sensitive finding because untreated severe hypertension increases the risk of stroke and other maternal complications. In litigation, the record often turns on exact measurement and treatment times.
Read Article →
Pregnancy can make sepsis harder to recognize. Heart rate, respiratory rate, white blood cell count, and blood volume differ from the nonpregnant state, while postpartum physiology and common obstetric conditions can obscure early deterioration.
Read Article →
Forceps- and vacuum-assisted delivery can be appropriate, evidence-based options that expedite birth and sometimes avoid cesarean delivery. The core legal question is whether the prerequisites, instrument choice, technique, reassessment, and stopping point were reasonable.
Read Article →
A fetus below the 10th percentile is not automatically pathologically growth restricted, and a fetus above it is not automatically healthy. Fetal growth restriction litigation requires review of dating, growth trajectory, Doppler findings, surveillance, maternal disease, and delivery timing.
Read Article →
Placenta accreta spectrum cases are often framed around hemorrhage at delivery, but the most important decisions may have occurred weeks earlier: risk recognition, imaging, referral, counseling, blood-bank planning, team assembly, and delivery location.
Read Article →
In obstetric litigation, decision-to-incision time is often treated as though every emergency must result in delivery within exactly 30 minutes. That is not a universal biologic deadline, and the number should not replace analysis of the indication, urgency, fetal physiology, logistics, and outcome.
Read Article →OBGYN Peer provides independent medical record review and obstetric expert witness services for plaintiff and defense attorneys. Contact Dr. Malik to discuss your case.